Why stanza doesnt work




















How are we doing? Please help us improve Stack Overflow. Take our short survey. Stack Overflow for Teams — Collaborate and share knowledge with a private group. Create a free Team What is Teams? Collectives on Stack Overflow. Learn more. Asked 2 months ago. Active 2 months ago.

Viewed 54 times. Improve this question. Add a comment. Active Oldest Votes. Sign up or log in Sign up using Google. I fear the Windows issue cannot be solved easily, but what about the warning in Linux. Can we do anything about that? Hi, it looks like the pickle issue is coming from stanza , not spacy-stanza , so there's nothing we can do directly here. It's currently a logger warning in v3. We were hoping that using the logger would make filtering easier, but it turned out to be a headache in terms of warnings in particular.

There will also be a new helper function to make it easier to filter warnings and some automatic "once" filtering of annoying warnings, see: , I think it's not even a stanza issue, but a torch-on-Windows issue. Similar to how multiprocessing dataloaders are an issue on that platform. That being said, I don't think this is more a spacy-stanza problem than a stanza problem: spaCy's nlp. But as I said: more a torch issue then anything else. Okay, interesting to see that the warnings did not turn out as expected.

Will the errors also be removed? I use those in my library, so it would be good to know beforehand if they will end up stop working.

The error makes it look like a stanza issue, at least the initial problem. I don't know if it would work if you fixed the unpickleable lambdas, though, or if you'd run into further issues. We've had to modify similar code in spacy for multiprocessing with spawn. Well, for one thing, it seems to me to be curious that the stanza is so little discussed: while any workshop group or poetry class worth its salt is likely to take a new writer to task over poorly executed line breaks, my experience is that stanza breaks get much less attention.

From talking with other poets, I know that many construct stanzas according to their own feeling, not necessarily with any clear principles in mind. The veritable epidemic of poems written in non-rhyming couplets in contemporary poetry — surely the formal trend of our day — perhaps suggests a lack of certainty over what stanzas are really for, unless the poem is being written to a set form. And even within those set forms, is it just a matter of following a pattern, or do the stanzas themselves help to make meaning in particular ways?

Not only will the course provide participants with the space to think about these issues, and some useful examples to follow, but it will hopefully also be an opportunity to explore together what is, after all, the second significant structural element of poetry itself.

Otherwise, you have a static poem, which is another way of saying that you have a dead poem. Thinking more carefully about stanzas as a key structural element can help you to keep your poems moving, and not necessarily in the directions your reader was expecting. Imagine your poem is like a house that others will visit.

They will move from room to room and stop for a while in each. Each little unit makes sense, but so does the whole.



0コメント

  • 1000 / 1000