What type of plane is qf 2

It was intended that the curtain of fire it threw up would be sufficient to deter attacking aircraft, which it did, but was hampered by the ineffective Mk III director. The multi-barrel Vickers 40mm "Pom-Pom" antiaircraft mounting was introduced to the Royal Navy in the early s. In , one example of this weapon was experimentally mounted on the upper envelope of His Majesty's Airship 23r.

A record flight of 40 hours 8 minutes was made in May , as well as experiments with defensive armament of a 2-pounder 40 mm QF gun and three machine guns. Vickers S gun 40 mm "Vickers S" gun 40 mm 1. The ammunition was based on the 40xR cartridge case of the naval 2 pdr Anti-aircraft gun the "Pom-pom". Anti-aircraft guns. The ship's armament consisted of six 4.

The pom-poms on Repulse shot down two of the four confirmed kills made by Force Z, [15] while Prince of Wales ' pom-poms did record hits on enemy aircraft. Later innovations such as Remote Power Control RPC coupled to a radar-equipped tachymetric speed predicting director increased the accuracy enormously and problems with the fuses and reliability were also remedied.

The single mountings received a reprieve toward the end of the war as the 20 mm Oerlikon guns had insufficient stopping power to counter Japanese kamikaze aircraft and there were insufficient numbers of Bofors guns to meet demand.

The latter was the more successful design, and found some use as an anti-tank weapon. It had a semi-automatic horizontally sliding breech block , and was shipped on a manually trained pedestal mount.

The weapon was not a success, and of the 1, ordered only some were delivered. It was replaced by the Molins 6-pounder gun , the British Army 's Ordnance QF 6 pounder gun 57 mm with an auto-loader. Military Wiki Explore. Popular pages. Project maintenance. Register Don't have an account?

QF 2-pounder naval gun. Edit source History Talk 0. This article is about the anti-aircraft autocannon. Main article: QF 1 pounder pom-pom. World War II high-velocity 2-pounder shells.

A stack of 14 linked rounds of naval pom-pom ammunition. London: Ian Allan, , Page The first eight-barrelled mounting weighed Campbell notes that a quad USN Bofors mount weighed The report does not note any 40mm Bofors kills or even hits from the Prince of Wales ' Bofors gun, while hits from pom-pom fire were recorded by the crew of the Prince of Wales.

Brown notes that 3 out of 4 type radars were out of service when Prince of Wales departed Singapore. IV—VI Webley. QF 6 pounder Hotchkiss QF 6 pounder 6 cwt. RML 2. There are so many retired Fs available that plenty can be used as combat UAVs. The F manufacturer Lockheed is not doing the UAV conversion research, but rather another aircraft company Boeing which sees a potential market for such aircraft.

This would be an inexpensive way to see what a more ambitious and larger UCAV could do. But the cost of developing the MQ was deemed too high to be worthwhile. By MQ-9s were demonstrating their ability to take over some F ground attack functions and work was underway to develop even higher performance unmanned combat aircraft that could operate autonomously. Meanwhile, the American AFRL Air Force Research Laboratory had, by , developed and tested a new system that can turn any manned aircraft into an unmanned aircraft, controlled by a system of electronics and mechanical devices that literally replaces the human pilot in the cockpit.

Installation takes a little longer, but not by much because the device is designed to be available quickly should the need arise. ROBOPilot software has to have an electronic profile of each aircraft it can be installed in and has to be tested to ensure the ROBOPilot mechanical components can use all the controls of that aircraft. That said, cockpits on aircraft are pretty standard. The most complex and eccentric cockpits are for fighter aircraft and the air force has decades of experience building custom versions of what became ROBOPilot for several generations of jet fighters.

While electronic controls are easier for ROBOPilot, the most difficult aspect of developing ROBOPilot is creating a robotic arm and hand to handle the many tasks a human pilot has to handle. The s Cessna was mostly mechanical controls and analog displays for instruments. Moreover, the Cessna cockpit is cramped compared to more modern aircraft.

But the Cessna was also cheaper to use as a test aircraft for the first flight, from a remote airfield in a thinly populated area, in case all the safety devices failed and there was a crash. There were no problems and the entire two-hour flight was recorded on video from inside the aircraft.

That idea was the outgrowth of more than half a century of efforts to automate cockpit functions. By the s it was possible to create robotic pilots for fighter aircraft. Back then that had some very critical practical applications. The main purpose of remotely controlled fighter aircraft so they can be used as realistic aerial targets. The equipment used to convert retired fighters into robotic ones has become more capable and reliable since the s, and part of that effort turned into the successful development of automatic landing systems for commercial aircraft, which are now a common item that takes a lot of stress out of landing an airliner at night or in bad weather.

This software has even been adapted to land jet fighters or naval UAVs on aircraft carriers at night. This led to Loyal Wingman. In early the air force demonstrated that Fs equipped to operate as UAVs could successfully operate in formation with manned Fs.

The F UAV needed software that would allow it to fly in formation, execute attack missions on its own and avoid interference from jamming. That software worked although the initial flight tests of Loyal Wingman simply confirmed that the F UAVs could safely fly in formation with piloted Fs and effectively receive and respond to commands from the flight leader or other piloted Fs.

Work is continuing to develop software that will enable the F UAV to carry out complex attack runs on its own. This involves avoiding ground fire mainly missiles and using its own EW electronic warfare equipment to deal with jamming. All this live software testing would eventually be used in combat UAVs like the ones the navy has been testing and the air force is now developing.

The U. Army has already been testing similar software control of UAVs by suitably equipped with secure digital commo gear attack helicopters.