What is the difference between socialism and communism yahoo answers

Hitler did not support in any way the principles of Marxism. Hitler was strongly opposed to Marxism. There are no similarities between multicultural education and Marxism. Log in. Karl Marx. Add an answer. Want this question answered?

Study guides. Q: What are 3 ideas of marxism? Write your answer Related questions. Was marxism named after? What were the chief ideas of Marxism? Where did marxism originate? The ideas and beliefs of Karl Marx are known as what? Which was the body of ideas forming the basic tenets of modern socialism and communism? Is Marxism good for government and economics?

Propaganda used during the Russian Revolution? What are the three elements in Marxism? What are the difference between marxism and neo marxism? Which was first communism or marxism. Was communism conceived from marx's ideas or was it the other way rround? What are the similarities to marxism and capitalism? What rhymes with marxism? When was Rethinking Marxism created? When did Marxism Today end? When was Living Marxism created? Check Denmark for example, possibly the most egalitarian country on the planet, and not a T party nazi in site.

The rest of the world is succeeding through Capitalism. On the other hand, Europe is collapsing because of its expensive welfare state and drift towards Socialism. You talk about Denmark? Denmark and the rest of the Scandinavian countries are projected to decline the most over the next 50 years. It is a fact — their economies will slow down drastically and much of the world will surpass them.

So maybe the current generation is living well, but the future is looking bleak. The same is true for all of Europe. First world and egalitarian now… third world in the next century. Europeans have become too complacent and are wasting all of their wealth and resources. But what about the future? They are not thinking ahead. The modern generation may be able to get away with working relatively few hours, having many vacation days, years off for maternity leave, a young retirement age, universal healthcare, and favorable unemployment benefits, but the next generation will not.

The privileges Europeans currently enjoy cost money and they are not a recipe for staying competitive in this global world. We are seeing the results with what has been happening in Greece, Spain, Portugal, Italy etc over the last few years.

European economies are not growing, they are contracting. Capitalist economies are growing. Your analysis of Europe is all over the map. First of all, the stated outcome of a prediction cannot be a fact until it has already happened.

Or are you just making more assumptions based on media nonsense you hear over here? Therefore the problem was not Socialism or Communism. They then adopted much of those policies for the rest of China. China began to release its grip on its citizens until pro freedom groups began protesting for more freedom.

Remember Tinamin Square? Totally wrong, Leo. A welfare state might, in your eyes, be shit. And to pay hundreds of thousands for your child to be studying, is also shit. First of all. Moreover, you should be thanking the USA for subsidizing healthcare developments, especially pharmaceuticals, for all the nationalized EU systems that set price controls and force investment elsewhere. China still has a terrible standard of living under the ultimate capitalist society- free market but no human rights.

Countries in Europe like in Scandinavia are very rich and have welfare states, and have great standards of living. Just a thought. Selling more means people have to buy more and we need to thus produce more… which in turn means extract more from the earth and probably throw away more… the scandinavian countries that you mentionned understand that and live accordingly. Maybe a bit of travelling might do you good. Also… just a friendly reminder.

Your current president has gone bankrupt about… well lets not be mean here and actually show a number. You can wiki it yourself. But again, travelling might be informative to you in many ways.

I have learned many langages on my own including English and found that curiosity and open mindedness are often the remedy to preconceived notions we get from people that were not worried about the future of this planet. Like the boomers that are currently teaching at Yale and Harvard.

You could flatter yourself for being a college educated male. But until you have seen something else, maybe you should not post your opinions on political web sites.

Cause they are not really your opinions. They are the opinions of your teachers. I bid you a good one…. Lived in Europe for many years and I know they have looked ahead for the solution, and it will be final. There is very difficult adopt the ideology of communism … Socialism is better or easy to handel. Upon dropping comment, just be aware of giving supporting details that would make it more clear for other readers, I think that would be more beneficial. Good discussion except where those on the left start cursing.

The Left in the US are increasingly hostile, not toward all religion but especially toward Christianity. It would seem that truth must be destroyed on the way to completing the lie. But those states which most strongly embrace capitalism will show great success.

The US is clearly on a dead end path in this cycle. There is direct references in the constitution concerning the freedom of religion and the separation between church and state. Please answer me this questions…. Who would Jesus bomb? How many women would Jesus grab by the pussy? Which poor, disenfranchised and marginalized group would Jesus take from to give millionaires, billionaires and multi-billion dollar multinational corporations yet another tax cut? Many more Democrats who may NOT claim to be Christians have also recently been brought down by their behavior.

Your dark view of those who disagree with you politically seems to have given you a dark view of a faith that teaches what you seem to want. For you to imply that there is something virtuous about being hostile toward Christianity is wrong. Everybody sins regardless of political party or religious views.

The big difference we are seeing right now is republicans who claim to have the moral high ground and use their platforms to preach their beliefs are getting caught in some very unsavory positions that they deny or use their platforms to victim blame , while democrats are just getting caught and most are even apologizing.

This is a much bigger argument about the separation of church and state, because even Americas forefathers, who could have never known what this country and their words were going to be used for, knew that religion has no place in politics or how laws should be decided and applied. And so, now more then ever, it is extremely important to call out and even bash politicians who do anything in the name of their religious views, because lets be clear, these men are not morally superior or a compass for what good choices look like.

Last but not least, since this is a forum about socialism vs. At one time capitalism really worked for our country, but times have changed and so have the needs of the people. I happily pay taxes and vote for tax increases because I would rather have a little less and know that everyone out there has what humans need to survive and feel safe. So in closing, the only people who would really be against everyone living with the means to support themselves and their families without fear of losing it all or going without, are people who probably already have too much money.

This is from frontpagemag. This influx of new members led us to have a national Party school earlier this year to acquaint new members with the Marxist-Leninist orientation of the Party. I understand where your comment is coming from, but to suggest that Barack Obama is a communist because he is supported by the communist party is the same line of reasoning used to say that Donald Trump is a racist because he is supported by the KKK.

Just because someone is endorsed by a certain group does not imply that they [the endorsed person] agree with the endorsement, nor does it imply that they agree with the ideals and ideologies of the endorsing group. Seriously just used a derogatory word against a group of people while defending a government you feel is better for all people with the principle that all are created equal.

The rest of it was pretty low as well, but before you say others are hateful you may want to check yourself. Cindy, it is quite obvious that you do not understand the basic concepts of satire… Retard. As someone who dabbled a lot with red politics in my younger days I currently lean libertarian , this article is clearly written by a socialist who is essentially enforcing the anti-communist social stigma, in order to potentially prop up the view of socialism in the eye of the reader.

This article is talking about socialism, and only socialism. As the USSR, China, and Cuba, which seems to be the inspiration for what the article refers to as communist, were really just socialist states based to varying degrees on Marxism. Socialism is, according to Marx, the transitional state in which the government takes control of all means of production.

Communism, to me, has always seemed to have more in common with anarchism, than socialism. There is no difference in meaning here. Religion can in fact be the catalyst for the formation of communistic societies. See Jonestown.

On the other hand, those that attempt to dodge the consequences of a Communist Transformation by emigrating will have their lands rearranged and took. This whole thing is wrong.

Capitalism, socialism, and communism are all modes of producing and distributing goods and services, each successively replacing the former when the former has exhausted its potential and becomes irrelevant to circumstances. Each system is like a software upgrade to the economy. Under capitalism, goods and services become produced on a social basis, requiring a more and more intertwined network of workers to collaborate to produce goods on a mass scale.

Under feudalism, which preceded capitalism, all goods were the products of an individual, but under capitalism, no individual can claim to be the sole producer of any good. Under socialism, goods and services become increasingly socially produced, and now socially distributed.

All the means of production gradually become public property. Goods that are scarce and competitive remain distributed on an individual basis; goods that are no longer scarce are distributed on a social basis, with free access for the individual. Under communism, all goods and services are socially distributed, with free access for the individual to everything produced. Conservatism is not characterized by how many or few people are involved in the decision making process.

By that logic a Dictatorship or a Kingdom would be the ultimate for of conservatism due to decisions being made by only 1 individual.

Reason: There can be many different types of government running a Communist or Socialist country. Correct statement: 2. In socialism and communism, the resources of the economy are managed and controlled by the people themselves, although in communism, a single authoritarian party might take over, and then the management and control would rest on only a few people. Reason: In communism there can be many types of government. There are no social classes.

Everyone is equal in communism. Reason: Communists can own certain types personal properties, just not things like factories, which could oppress the workers. Notice how I said perfectly. Communism could still work, but not as well. The whole world would need to be communist. The idea of government run control and less freedom of the people is a an obvious liberal way of thinking. Freedom of the people and less government control is conservative, regardless of the numbers in the government.

The number is irrelevant, the control and who has it is the key. Conservatives want govt. They want to the govt. They want to abolish abortion and then not take care of the unwanted babies. Double standard. What we have today is a society breaking free of the brainwashing from the past. We were able to break through due to their greediness.

That will be their ultimate demise. The masses in this country are becoming more and more impoverished. Because of this they are questioning everything they have been taught. The conservative party will ultimately fail if they continue to not address the wealth inequality. Socialism means direct control and management of the industries and social services by the workers through a democratic government based on their nationwide economic organization.

Calista Czarniak Pundit. How is capitalism bad? Capitalism has been criticized for establishing power in the hands of a minority capitalist class that exists through the exploitation of a working class majority; for prioritizing profit over social good, natural resources and the environment; and for being an engine of inequality and economic instabilities.

Bertila Travers Pundit. Is France a socialist country? In addition, countries like Belarus, Colombia, France , Russia and Spain use the varied term social state, leaving a more ambiguous meaning. In the constitutions of Croatia, Hungary and Poland, direct condemnation is made to the respective past socialist regimes. Agapita Yakobl variation of Jacob Pundit. Is the US a capitalist society? Capitalism and Democracy. Boughaleb Zirelsohn Pundit.

What are the goals of capitalism? Capitalism is often thought of as an economic system in which private actors own and control property in accord with their interests, and demand and supply freely set prices in markets in a way that can serve the best interests of society.

The essential feature of capitalism is the motive to make a profit. Floare Doble Teacher. Is Marxism and socialism the same? The Marxist definition of socialism is an economic transition. Unlike the Marxian conception, these conceptions of socialism retained commodity exchange markets for labour and the means of production seeking to perfect the market process.

The Marxist idea of socialism was also heavily opposed to utopian socialism. Cesareo Escabia Teacher. Is socialism good for the economy? Socialists generally aim to achieve greater equality in decision-making and economic affairs, grant workers greater control of the means of production and their workplace, and to eliminate exploitation by directing the surplus value to employees. Agostino Humeau Teacher. What does it mean to be laissez faire? Oumayma Notman Teacher. When did communism officially end?

Fall of Communism in Eastern Europe, On November 9, , thousands of jubilant Germans brought down the most visible symbol of division at the heart of Europe—the Berlin Wall. Stevan Gadeke Reviewer. What is communist ideology? Communism from Latin communis, "common, universal" is a philosophical, social, political and economic ideology and movement whose ultimate goal is the establishment of a communist society, namely a socioeconomic order structured upon the ideas of common ownership of the means of production and the absence of social.